Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2011] NZERA Auckland 18
Hearing date 21 Dec 2010
Determination date 17 January 2011
Member A Dumbleton
Representation L Darroch ; D France
Location Auckland
Parties Bourne v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Applicant stated had never been convicted of criminal offence on employment application – Applicant offered employment conditional on receiving criminal conviction information – Criminal convictions report recorded five convictions applicant had accrued during three year period – Applicant invited to meeting to discuss report and respondent’s concerns regarding misrepresentation of personal information – Applicant warned matter serious and dismissal possible – Applicant’s explanations rejected by respondent – Applicant dismissed – Subsequently applicant raised personal grievance – Applicant claimed acted honestly, without intent to deceive or mislead – Authority found question whether fair and reasonable for employer not to accept applicant’s explanation of innocent mistake – Found respondent’s rejection of applicant’s explanation action of fair and reasonable employer – Found respondent reasonably entitled to believe applicant had not forgotten about offending for which convicted, even though offending six years before completed application form – Found respondent carefully evaluated applicant’s explanations before rejecting on grounds of credibility – Found unlikely applicant would have forgotten convictions – Authority rejected applicant’s argument about standard of representation at disciplinary inquiry – Found conditions of employment clearly stated in offer – Found continuity of employment dependent on condition being satisfied – Found no unjustified dismissal
Result Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A;Clean Records (Clean Slate) Act 2003
Number of Pages 8
PDF File Link: 2011_NZERA_Auckland_18.pdf [pdf 25 KB]