-
New Zealand Meatworkers and Related Trades Union Inc v Alliance Group Ltd
M B Loftus [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for removal to Employment Court (“EC”) – Matter concerned effect of amendment to minimum annual leave entitlement in Holidays Act 2003 on annual leave provisions…
- Result:
- Application granted; Costs reserved
-
Guilin v Koura Bay Wines Ltd (In Receivership)
M B Loftus [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Identity of employer – Authority found no statement applicant would become employee of respondent – Found respondent had no need for applicant’s services and unlikely to…
- Result:
- Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
-
Gray v Murrays Veterinary Clinic Ltd
H Doyle [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Admissibility of evidence – Authority noted another Authority member to investigate parties’ substantive issues – Found any concerns about probative or prejudicial value of particular evidence…
- Result:
- Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
-
Petrowski v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (formerly The Chief Executive of the Department of Labour)
P R Stapp [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- PARENTAL LEAVE – Applicant sought review of respondent’s decision applicant not eligible for paid parental leave (“PPL”) – Authority found applicant employed continuously by employer under different employment arrangements and…
- Result:
- Application granted; Costs reserved
-
Ingram v Southern Florring (2011) Ltd
C Hickey [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Incapacity - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed – Authority found applicant dismissed when applicant told respondent fit to return to work after injury – Found respondent had no…
- Result:
- Application granted ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($2,000) ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($9,017.09) ; Costs reserved
-
McNaught v Prime Range Meats Ltd
C Hickey [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Constructive Dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by content of written warning and constructively dismissed or alternatively unjustifiably disadvantaged by transfer to new work…
- Result:
- Application granted (unjustified disadvantage) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($1,250) ; Application dismissed (unjustified dismissal) ; Costs reserved
-
Tiller v New Zealand Car Rental Specialists 2004 Ltd
E Robinson [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious Misconduct – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Respondent claimed trust and confidence in applicant undermined by applicant dishonestly using document and assisting respondent’s director…
- Result:
- Applications granted; Contributory conduct (100%); Arrears of wages ($2,632.26); Arrears of holiday pay ($1,069.94); Costs reserved
-
Thompson v 88 C-Force Textile Industries Ltd
R Larmer [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY – DISPUTE - Applicant sought arrears of wages and holiday pay and interest – Parties disputed interpretation, application or operation of employment agreement (“EA”)…
- Result:
- Question answered in favour or applicant ; Arrears of wages ($185,144.72) ; Arrears of holiday pay (parties to determine quantum) ; Costs reserved
-
Watson v Air New Zealand Ltd
R A Monaghan [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- COSTS – Unsuccessful personal grievance claim – One and a half day investigation meeting – Respondent sought $9,000 contribution towards costs – Authority found respondent entitled to costs with daily…
- Result:
- Costs in favour of respondent ($6,250)
-
Nand v Richmond NZ Trust Ltd
R A Monaghan [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- DISPUTE - Parties disputed whether settlement agreement (“SA”) enforceable – Respondent claimed applicant could not continue with matter in Authority as parties had already settled - Authority found applicant’s…
- Result:
- Question answered in favour of respondent ; Costs reserved