-
Gillard v APN Print NZ Ltd
V Campbell [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- DISPUTE – Whether applicant entitled to “No 1 Printer” wage rate pursuant to collective employment agreement (“CEA”) – Applicant claimed entitled to “No 1 Printer” wage rate as paid at…
- Result:
- Questions answered in favour of respondent ; Application granted (Disadvantage) ; Compliance ordered ; Orders made ; Parties directed to mediation ; Costs reserved
-
Prenderville v Hokotehi Moriori Trust
G J Wood [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER - Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement at investigation meeting - Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority - Order prohibiting publication of terms of settlement
- Result:
- Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs
-
Kells v Davis t/a Davis Law
D Asher [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER - Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement at investigation meeting following Authority's request for a mediator - Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority - Order…
- Result:
- Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs
-
Wallace & Ors v Dr Peter Yee t/a Turangi Cabins and Holiday Park
P R Stapp [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – No appearance for respondent – Applicants claimed unjustifiably dismissed without notice – Applicants’ employment relationship with respondent deteriorated over several incidents – Respondent failed to pay power…
- Result:
- Applications granted ; Arrears of wages ($4,800)($142.86)(Day in lieu)(First applicant) ($2,840)($142.86)(Day in lieu)(Second applicant) ; Holiday pay ($2,160)(First and second applicant) ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($13,000)(First and second applicant) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($3,000)(First and second applicant) ; Disbursements in favour of applicants ($70)(Filing fee)
-
Steffen v Regent International Education Group Ltd
Y S Oldfield [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious misconduct – Applicant claimed dismissal substantively and procedurally unjustified – Applicant claimed did not harass student, denied serious misconduct, and argued not given opportunity to answer…
- Result:
- Application granted (Unjustified dismissal) ; No remedies (100 percent contributory conduct) ; Costs reserved
-
Stacey v Jagar Management Ltd
D King [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- JURISDICTION – Whether person intending to work – Applicant employed at business (“FC”) which entered into sale and purchase negotiations with respondent - FC advised employees uncertain whether employment would…
- Result:
- Application dismissed ; No order for costs
-
New Zealand Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v Affco New Zealand Ltd
V Campbell [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- DISPUTE – Whether respondent entitled to unilaterally change working hours under collective employment agreement (“CEA”) – CEA provided specified ordinary working hours per week – CEA provided agreement on start…
- Result:
- Question answered in favour of applicant ; Costs reserved
-
Lloyd-Barker v The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Auckland Inc
K J Anderson [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- COSTS - Unsuccessful unjustified dismissal claim - Partially successful unjustified disadvantage claim - One day investigation meeting - Respondent sought $10,000 contribution to total costs of $15,000 - Respondent acknowledged…
- Result:
- Costs in favour of respondent ($7,000)
-
Came v Classique International Ltd
R Arthur [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER - Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement at investigation meeting - Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority - Order prohibiting publication of terms of settlement
- Result:
- Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs
-
French v The Warehouse Ltd
Y S Oldfield [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – Serious Misconduct - Applicant claimed suspension without consultation caused unjustified disadvantage – Respondent argued serious misconduct warranted suspension – Applicant confronted respondent’s manager (“Y”) about alleged…
- Result:
- Application granted (Unjustified disadvantage – Suspension) ; Applications dismissed (Unjustified disadvantage – Breach of confidentiality and bullying)(Unjustified dismissal) ; Remedies declined ; Costs reserved