Search results

Results 12801-12810 of 21097

  • Smith v Stokes Valley Pharmacy (2009) Ltd

    G J Wood [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]

    Summary:
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Application for removal to Employment Court (“EC”) - Applicant sought removal on grounds important questions of law likely to arise other than incidentally and in all…
    Result:
    Application granted ; No order for costs

  • Collier-Wilson v Auckland District Health Board

    K J Anderson [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by respondent’s failure to adhere to harassment policy in policy manual – Also claimed respondent failed to act in good faith – Shortly…
    Result:
    Applications dismissed (Unjustified disadvantage)(Recovery of monies) ; Costs reserved

  • Abbott v Fresh Connection Ltd

    P R Stapp [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]

    Summary:
    COSTS – Unsuccessful personal grievance – Less than one day investigation meeting – Respondent sought $1,600 as reasonable contribution to costs – Applicant argued no costs award - Argued alternatively…
    Result:
    Costs in favour of respondent ($750)

  • Cousins and Anor v Booth

    P Cheyne [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]

    Summary:
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Correct identity of employer – Applicants claimed employed by respondent at all material times – Respondent argued applicants employed by company (“X”) – Respondent shareholder and…
    Result:
    Applications granted (Arrears of wages)(Arrears of holiday pay) ; Application dismissed (Penalty) ; Arrears of wages ($9,480)(First applicant) ($8,820)(Second applicant) ; Holiday pay (Quantum to be determined)(First and second applicant) ; Interest (4.5%) ; Costs reserved

  • Heaney v Herbert t/a Equestrian Hotel and Anor

    P Cheyne [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]

    Summary:
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Correct identity of applicant’s employer – Applicant claimed first respondent employer at all times – First respondent claimed applicant employed by second respondent – Applicant received…
    Result:
    Application granted (Unjustified dismissal) ; Application dismissed (Penalty) ; Two weeks pay in lieu (Quantum to be determined) ; Compensation for humiliation ($6,000) ; Costs reserved

  • Paea v Department of Corrections

    M Urlich [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    COSTS - Unsuccessful personal grievance - One day investigation meeting - Respondent sought $5,000 contribution to total costs of over $20,000 - Respondent also sought $384 travel expenses and $400…
    Result:
    Costs in favour of respondent ($3,000) ; Disbursements in favour of respondent ($50)

  • Riosa v NRG Home Electrical Ltd

    M Urlich [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    COSTS - Unsuccessful personal grievance - Two day investigation meeting - Respondent sought $6,000 contribution to total costs of $7132 plus disbursements - Respondent claimed applicant wholly unsuccessful and costs…
    Result:
    Costs in favour of respondent ($5,000) ; Disbursements in favour of respondent ($50)

  • Spice v Firth Industries, a division of Fletcher Concrete and Infrastructure Ltd

    D King [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious misconduct – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed – Claimed disadvantaged as respondent took no actions in regards to applicant’s bullying complaints – Applicant claimed…
    Result:
    Application dismissed ; Costs reserved

  • Riley v Acrow Limited

    R A Monaghan [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious misconduct - Applicant and co-worker (“W”) took longer than expected to arrive at job site for urgent job – Respondent investigated and found based on GPS…
    Result:
    Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($201.88) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($3,000) ; Costs reserved

  • Robinson v Rentokil Initial Ltd

    D King [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious misconduct – Applicant claimed conduct did not constitute serious misconduct warranting dismissal – Respondent argued dismissal justified – Applicant attended disciplinary meeting to answer three allegations…
    Result:
    Application dismissed ; Costs reserved