-
Hirst v Pirtek Manawatu (2002) Ltd and Anor
G J Wood [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER - Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement - Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority - Order prohibiting publication of terms of settlement
- Result:
- Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs
-
Roach v MTV Networks New Zealand Ltd
A Dumbleton [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER - Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement at investigation meeting - Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority - Order prohibiting publication of terms of settlement…
- Result:
- Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs
-
Secretary of Justice v Gibbons & Ors
G J Wood [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- DISPUTE - Ministry of Justice (“MoJ”) instituted review of M�ori Land Court’s operations - Respondents involved in review until MoJ considered potential for conflict of interest - MoJ’s new structure…
- Result:
- Questions answered ; Costs reserved
-
McAtear v New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Ltd
H Doyle [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – Applicant claimed disadvantaged when managers (“R” and “C”) failed to rotate applicant off smelter fire work when requested – Applicant claimed suffered heat rash due to failure…
- Result:
- Application granted (Disadvantage) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($5,000) ; Costs reserved
-
Davidson v Y3K Energy Pty Ltd & Anor
Y S Oldfield [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Serious misconduct - Applicant called to meeting with respondents’ managing director (“K”) - Applicant given two days to choose resignation or dismissal - Applicant sought legal advice…
- Result:
- Application granted (Unjustified dismissal) ; Application dismissed (Counter claim) ; Costs reserved
-
Soo Han v Ko & Won Ltd t/a Kino Sushi
V Campbell [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed - Respondent argued applicant failed to provide documents requested to show legally entitled to work in New Zealand and therefore dismissal justified –…
- Result:
- Application granted (Unjustified dismissal) ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($6,346.15) ; Arrears of wages ($1,153.84)(2 weeks) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($3,000) ; Costs reserved
-
Clarke v Roadsafe Ltd
R A Monaghan [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Constructive dismissal – Applicant claimed resignation caused by respondent’s breach of term of employment regarding provision of company vehicle – Respondent denied provision of company vehicle was…
- Result:
- Applications dismissed ; Costs reserved
-
Dudley v Sub Five Private Security Ltd
J Crichton [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – Respondent altered roster, significantly changing applicant’s shift rotation, without informing applicant – New roster did not suit applicant - Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by roster change -…
- Result:
- Application granted (Unjustified disadvantage) ; Application dismissed (Unjustified dismissal) ; Costs to lie where they fall
-
Manson & Ors v Solid Energy New Zealand Ltd
J Crichton [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Redundancy – Applicants claimed respondent failed to comply with consultation and selection requirements in collective employment agreement (“CEA”) – Respondent argued complied with CEA and union failed…
- Result:
- Applications granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages (12 months less other earnings and contractual compensation)(quantum to be determined) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($10,000 per applicant) ; Costs reserved
-
Shanks & Ors v South Pacific Meats Ltd
P Montgomery [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Applicants claimed respondent’s failure to rehire at end of season amounted to unjustified dismissal – Applicants claimed positions permanent and should have been rehired for new season…
- Result:
- Application dismissed ; Costs reserved