Search results

Results 16291-16300 of 21097

  • Metcalf (Labour Inspector) v Lal t/a Jag Lal Lawyers

    R A Monaghan [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    ARREARS OF HOLIDAY PAY - Applicant Labour Inspector sought arrears on behalf of P - Parties agreed sum owed - Respondent ordered to pay arrears due and owing - Interest…
    Result:
    Application granted (Arrears of holiday pay) ; Arrears of holiday pay ($918.49) ; Interest (7.7%) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($70)(Filing fee) ; Application dismissed (Penalty)

  • Taylor v eCom New Zealand

    D King [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    ARREARS OF WAGES - Applicant claimed owed unpaid commissions - Performance incentive to be paid on all new business closed from new or existing clients" - Earlier determination held…
    Result:
    Application dismissed ; Counterclaim dismissed (Penalty) ; Counterclaim granted (Damages) ; Damages ($8,836.94) ; Interest (14.5%) ; Costs reserved

  • Moe v Mt Roskill Panelbeaters & Spraypainters

    M Urlich [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    COSTS - Unsuccessful personal grievance - Less than one day investigation meeting - Respondent incurred total costs of $7,459 and disbursements of $322 - Respondent submitted reasonable contribution would be…
    Result:
    Costs in favour of respondent ($2,000) ; Disbursements ($200)

  • Sneddon v Towers Auckland (2002) Ltd

    Y S Oldfield [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    COSTS - Successful personal grievance - 1/2 day investigation meeting - Applicant sought full costs of $1,000 - Respondent argued substantive determination was silent on costs therefore costs should lie…
    Result:
    Costs in favour of applicant ($500)

  • MacDonald v Klenner

    Y S Oldfield [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    COSTS - Successful arrears claim - Investigation meeting less than one day - Applicant legally aided - Legal Services Agency sought $620 in costs from respondent - Resolution of straightforward…
    Result:
    Costs in favour of applicant ($620)

  • Harvey v Smith and Anor t/a D M Transport

    G J Wood [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Constructive dismissal – No appearance by respondent - Service on any particular member of partnership sufficient to constitute service on all partners - At…
    Result:
    Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($6,342.05)(Three months plus lost weekends) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($8,000) ; Arrears of wages ($560) ; Arrears of holiday pay ($336.80) ; Costs in favour of applicant ($1,500) ; Disbursements ($223) ; Interest (6%)

  • Gyles v Thumbprint 2 Ltd

    P R Stapp [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]

    Summary:
    COSTS - Successful personal grievance - One day investigation meeting - Applicant sought order for costs - Reasonable contribution to costs awarded to applicant of $3,000 plus filing fee
    Result:
    Costs in favour of applicant ($3,000) ; Disbursements ($70) (Filing Fee)

  • Perkins v Harbour City Signs Ltd

    D King [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Poor performance – Respondent claimed applicant received three warnings – First two “warnings” were not warnings as applicant not told employment in jeopardy or that she was…
    Result:
    Application granted(Unjustified dismissal) ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($3,273)(3 months less earnings) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($2,000) ; Application dismissed(Breach of contract) ; Costs reserved

  • Eruera-Morrison v New Zealand Post Ltd

    Y S Oldfield [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Before investigation, applicant's lawyer advised applicant would not be giving evidence to Authority - Authority Minute advised investigation would not proceed without hearing from applicant -…
    Result:
    Application dismissed ; No order for costs

  • National Distribution Union v Spotless Services Ltd

    K Raureti [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    BARGAINING - Applicant initiated bargaining for Multi Employer Collective Agreement (MECA") - Intended coverage included two cleaners employed by respondent – Respondent party to NZ Cleaning Contractors MECA with a…
    Result:
    Question answered in favour of applicant ; Costs to lie where they fall