-
Jarvis v Canterbury Cleaning Service Ltd
P Cheyne [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Redundancy - Respondent had contract to perform cleaning at a school until it lost contract to another cleaning contractor – Some discussion with staff about transferring to…
- Result:
- Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages (2 weeks' notice) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($1,500) ; Costs reserved
-
Carlton v Geary
P Montgomery [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - No written employment agreement - Applicant alleged she was employed for trial period of two months and when this passed she became permanent employee - Respondent alleged…
- Result:
- Application dismissed (unjustified dismissal) ; Application granted (unjustified disadvantage) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($500) ; Costs in favour of applicant ($400)
-
Halliday v Schizophrenia Fellowship NZ Inc
J Crichton [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Constructive dismissal - Resigned after altercation at meeting - However, reconsidered and returned to work - One year later resigned after notice of allegations against her about…
- Result:
- Applications dismissed ; Costs reserved
-
McLeman v New Zealand Commercial Care Ltd
J Crichton [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- COMPLIANCE ORDER - Applicant sought compliance with two Authority determinations - First determination ordered respondent to pay arrears of wages and holiday pay plus interest - Second determination ordered respondent…
- Result:
- Application granted ; Compliance ordered ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($70)(Filing fee)
-
Henning v Thompson
J Crichton [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- COMPLIANCE ORDER - Compliance with demand notice sought - No objection to demand notice - No appearance for respondent - Satisfied that demand notice was properly served on respondent -…
- Result:
- Compliance ordered ; Costs to lie where they fall
-
Kumar v Cool Units Ltd
Y S Oldfield [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- JURISDICTION - No appearance by respondent because respondent was about to be placed in voluntary liquidation - Since liquidation had not yet taken place Authority proceeded to determine matter -…
- Result:
- Application granted ; Arrears of wages ($810)
-
Aberhart v Simpsons Farms Ltd
V Campbell [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Redundancy - Applicant's position disestablished and new position created - Whether redundancy genuine - Respondent had identified need to have person operating at a higher level than…
- Result:
- Application granted ; Compensation ($15,000) ; Costs reserved
-
Steer v Gazley & Tulloch Motors Ltd
G J Wood;G J Wood [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER - Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement - Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority - Order prohibiting publication of all the contents of the terms…
- Result:
- Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs
-
Reij and Anor v Cammand Holdings Ltd
P Cheyne [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Serious misconduct - First applicant (R") involved in relationship with respondent's sole director ("M") - R lived on respondent's premises and helped with its operation - Relationship…
- Result:
- Application dismissed (C's unjustified dismissal claim) ; Application granted (R's unjustified dismissal and C and R's arrears claims) ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($11,750)(3 months) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($6,000) ; Arrears of wages (C)(to be calculated by parties) ; (R)($1,084.65) ; Other monies (R to pay respondent)($512.24) ; Costs reserved
-
Turkish House Ltd t/a Techloom Carpet & Rug Creations v Goris and Ors
J Wilson [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- COMPLIANCE ORDER - DAMAGES - In 2003, applicant had asked Authority to issue injunctions against first respondent, restraining him from continuing his employment with the second respondent - Also…
- Result:
- Application dismissed ; Costs reserved