-
Rankin v Unlimited Internet Ltd
T Tetitaha [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- COSTS – Successful personal grievance claim – One day investigation meeting – Applicant sought $6,500 towards costs – Respondent made Calderbank offer to applicant – Authority found applicant’s refusal of…
- Result:
- Costs in favour of applicant ($6,200)
-
Labour Inspector v Jingmin Sun t/a Suns Motors
R Larmer [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY – Applicant sought arrears of wages and holiday pay
- Result:
- Application granted ; Respondent to pay applicant arrears of wages and holiday pay ($78,664.08) ; No order for costs.
-
The New Zeakand Public Service Association Inc v Asurequality Ltd
T Tetitaha [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- DISPUTE – Parties disputed whether a Friday shift that continues into Saturday morning should be remunerated at time and a half – Meat Inspectors
- Result:
- Questions answered in favour of applicant ; Costs reserved
-
Pool v San Remo Pasta Ltd
Robin Arthur [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious Misconduct – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Supermarket Merchandiser
- Result:
- Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($2,158) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($12,000) ; Costs reserved
-
Pretorius v Fit Pit Ltd
T Tetitaha [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Whether applicant permanent or casual employee – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Fitness Instructor and Sales Consultant
- Result:
- Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($1,224) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($2,000) ; No order for costs
-
Lucas v Te Rito Daycare Ltd
Tania Tetitaha [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious Misconduct – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Pre-School Teacher
- Result:
- Application granted ; Contributory conduct (50%) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($5,000) ; Costs reserved
-
Sheard v Sands
E Robinson [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- JURISDICTION – Whether applicant employee or independent contractor – PENALTY – Applicant sought penalty for respondent’s failure to comply with the Employment Relations Act 2000 and the Holiday’s Act 2003…
- Result:
- Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
-
Welch v Auckland Glass Ltd
Anna Fitzgibbon [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- JURISDICTION – Whether valid 90 trial period – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious Misconduct – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Glass Sales Person
- Result:
- Applications granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($1,728) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($5,000) ; Costs reserved
-
Edmond v Goldstone Aluminium Ltd
A Fitzgibbon [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY – Applicant sought arrears of wages and holiday pay – Aluminium Window…
- Result:
- Applications granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($6,100) ; Arrears of wages ($732) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($10,000) ; Arrears of holiday pay ($2,662.72) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee) ; Costs to lie where they fall
-
Aklil v KA Motors Ltd
R Larmer [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER – Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement at investigation meeting – Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority – Order prohibiting publication of terms of settlement
- Result:
- Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs