-
Shand v MBS 2008 Ltd
P van Keulen [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Constructive Dismissal - Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by respondent’s actions - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent - Masseuse
- Result:
- Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
-
Wallberg v Kapsch Trafficcom Ltd
R Larmer [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER - Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement at investigation meeting - Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority - Order prohibiting publication of terms of settlement
- Result:
- Application granted ; Orders made
-
Vickers v Burgess Crowley Civil Ltd
M Loftus [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- COSTS – Unsuccessful personal grievance – Less than one day investigation meeting – Respondent sought contribution of $3,500 contribution towards costs – Authority found applicant’s failure to attend first…
- Result:
- Costs in favour of respondent ($2,000)
-
Allan and Ors v Sixta Enterprises Ltd (t/a Just Cuts New Plymouth) and Anor
T MacKinnon [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
-
Handy v New Zealand Fire Service Commission
T MacKinnon [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – Serious Misconduct – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by restructuring process undertaken by respondent – ARREAR OF WAGES…
- Result:
- Applications dismissed ; Costs reserved
-
Edley v Lenco Sport NZ Ltd
T Tetitaha [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Authority considered whether to re-open investigation on own motion
- Result:
- Application granted ; Costs reserved
-
Brennan v AFOS Ltd and Ors
R Larmer [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- DISPUTE - Quantification of remedies - Parties disputed what expert witness should calculate in order to quantify remedies
- Result:
- Questions answered ; Costs reserved
-
Gibson v Fineway Builders Ltd
R Larmer [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- JURISDICTION – Whether applicant employee or independent contractor – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – COSTS – Applicant sought contribution towards costs – Painter
- Result:
- Applications granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($2,196) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($3,500) ; Costs in favour of applicant ($750) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee)
-
Sturzaker v Ballance Agri-Nutrients Ltd
R Larmer [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious Misconduct – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Process Operator
- Result:
- Application dismissed ; No order for costs
-
Spillman v Tandem Skydivinig 2002 Ltd t/a Taupo Tandem Skydiving
T Tetitaha [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Whether applicant permanent or casual employee – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – PENALTY – Applicant sought penalty for…
- Result:
- Applications dismissed ; Costs reserved