Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No [2011] NZERA Wellington 202
Hearing date 13 Dec 2011
Determination date 13 December 2011
Member A Dumbleton
Representation B Buckett ; P Churchman
Location Wellington
Parties French v Acident Compensation Corporation
Summary PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for removal to Employment Court (“EC”) – Applicant claimed same or similar matter already before EC and in all circumstances EC should determine matter – Respondent opposed application – Authority previously found applicant not unjustifiably disadvantaged by respondent – Applicant challenged previous Authority determination and hearing date to be allocated by EC – Applicant returned to work after sick leave and told by respondent had been made redundant – Applicant claimed redundancy a sham – Applicant lodged second statement of problem alleging had been unjustifiably dismissed by respondent and sought removal to EC so applications could be heard together – Authority found EC and Authority proceedings involved related issues – Found matters in both applications could be seen as part of continuum related to parties’ second employment agreement (“EA”) – Found consequences of termination of EA might also give rise to important question of law – Found in all circumstances EC should determine matter as matter an evolving employment relationship problem between parties – Found would be unjust if applicant required to remain before Authority as would duplicate applicant’s costs – Found removal would avoid possible fragmentation of resolution of matter - Found matter would be most justly and efficiently disposed of if removed to EC - Matter removed to EC
Result Application granted ; Costs reserved
Main Category Practice & Procedure
Statutes ERA s178;ERA s178(2)(a);ERA s178(2)(c);ERA s178(2)(d)
Cases Cited French v Accident Compensation Corporation [2011] NZERA Wellington 2
Number of Pages 5
PDF File Link: 2011_NZERA_Wellington_202.pdf [pdf 24 KB]