Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2012] NZERA Auckland 34
Determination date 23 January 2012
Member R A Monaghan
Representation M O'Neill v A Russell
Location Auckland
Parties Greenbaum v Waikato District Health Board
Summary COSTS – Partially successful compliance order application and unsuccessful penalty claim – Half day investigation meeting – Applicant sought $3,000 contribution to $9,000 total costs – Applicant claimed entitled to costs as successful in part – Respondent sought $7,128 contribution to $10,800 total costs – Respondent made Calderbank offer – Applicant claimed Calderbank offer not relevant as awarded more than offer – Authority found applicant should have known what reimbursable expenses had incurred as at date of termination and amount less reimbursable expenses was less than offer – Found, however, that offer dependent on production of invoices and in absence of invoices arguably nil offer – Found Calderbank offer of little weight – Respondent claimed applicant’s claims imprecise – Found applicant amended claims numerous times and withdrew many of them – Found applicant provided little support beyond mere disagreement in relation to challenge of respondent’s calculation of payments – Respondent claimed applicant adopted unnecessarily litigious approach – Found matter capable of resolution by discussion between parties and instead subject of premature entry into litigation – Found applicant successful to such modest extent overall that not appropriate to make costs award in applicant’s favour – Found respondent successful party and entitled to costs – Found applicant’s conduct added unnecessarily to parties’ costs and warranted upwards adjustment of notional daily rate – Applicant to pay respondent $4,500 contribution towards costs
Result Costs in favour of respondent ($4,500)
Main Category Costs
Cases Cited PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808
Number of Pages 6
PDF File Link: 2012_NZERA_Auckland_34.pdf [pdf 25 KB]