Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No WA 83/02
Hearing date 3 Sep 2002
Determination date 06 September 2002
Member D Asher
Representation A Cressey ; G Ogilvie
Location Wellington
Parties McIntosh v Xu & Anor
Other Parties Naenae Auto Serice Station Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Alleged unlawful suspension - Alleged unlawful deduction of wages - Policy of deducting money from wages for theft by customers - Final written warning issued for lateness - Suspended without consultation or pay - Suspension procedurally unfair - Motive for suspension was to obtain money for customer thefts - Suspension substantively unjustified - Unlawfully withheld wages to gain consent for deductions - Disadvantage claim made out - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Whether dismissed or resigned - Suspended without pay - Alleged applicant resigned while suspended - Suspension was for indefinite period - Failed to contact applicant - Applicant did not resign - Arbitrary suspension for indefinite period amounted to constructive dismissal - Dismissal unjustified - PENALTY - Deductions of wages without consent illegal - Significant breaches of Wages Protection Act 1983 - Significant breaches of ERA - Penalty appropriate
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($8,347.50)(25 weeks) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($6,500) ; Penalty ($4,500)(Payable to Crown) ; ($500)(Payable to applicant) ; Costs reserved
Statutes ERA s64(2);ERA s64(3);ERA s65(1);Wages Protection Act 1983 s4
Cases Cited Auckland City Council v Hennessey [1982] ACJ 699;Auckland etc Shop Employees etc IUOW v Woolworths (NZ) Ltd [1985] ACJ 963 ; [1985] 2 NZLR 372;Curlew v Harvey Norman Stores (NZ) Pty Ltd [2002] 1 ERNZ 114;Tawhiwhirangi v Attorney-General in respect of the Chief Executive, Department of Justice [1994] 1 ERNZ 459
Number of Pages 17
PDF File Link: PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy.