Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No [2012] NZERA Christchurch 41
Determination date 06 March 2012
Member H Doyle
Representation J Goldstein ; A Sherriff
Location Christchurch
Parties X v The Secretary for Justice
Summary COSTS – Successful personal grievances – Two day investigation meeting – Applicant sought $16,000 contribution to $19,622 total costs – Applicant claimed respondent rejected counter offer to respondent’s Calderbank offer – Applicant sought increase in costs awarded rather than application of notional daily tariff due to rejection of offer – Respondent claimed each party rejected the other’s Calderbank offer which had effect of neutralising Calderbank offer – Respondent claimed applicant made unsuccessful attacks on every single procedural point related to investigation and disciplinary process decision – Respondent claimed scrutiny of process had effect of extending Authority proceedings unnecessarily – Respondent claimed successful in vast majority of issues in proceeding – Respondent claimed would have sought contribution to costs but decided not to given ongoing relationship between parties – Respondent claimed costs should lie where they fall – Authority did not take into account rejection of Calderbank offer – Found applicant not successful in several arguments about process leading to warning – Found approach taken by applicant particularly thorough – Found matter not particularly factually or legally complex – Authority reduced daily tariff for second day to take into account requirement of more detailed submissions – Found $6,500 contribution to costs appropriate
Result Costs in favour of applicant ($6,500) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($376.66)
Main Category Costs
Statutes ERA s103A
Cases Cited Bluestar Print Group (NZ) Ltd v David Mitchell [2010] ERNZ 446;PBO Ltd v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808
Number of Pages 6
PDF File Link: 2012_NZERA_Christchurch_41.pdf [pdf 27 KB]