| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2012] NZERA Auckland 98 |
| Hearing date | 19 Mar 2012 |
| Determination date | 19 March 2012 |
| Member | R Larmer |
| Representation | J McCall (in person) ; S Selby |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | McCall v Que Westgate Ltd |
| Summary | COMPLIANCE ORDER – Applicant sought compliance with settlement agreement (“SA”) – SA stated respondent would pay applicant $2,000 – Parties agreed respondent had failed to make any payments – Respondent failed to file statement in reply within timeframe or provide evidence of financial position – Applicant did not accept respondent’s suggestion would pay applicant $100 per month – Respondent claimed had no assets and significant debt – Authority granted leave for respondent to defend matter as participated fully at investigation meeting – Respondent claimed restructuring debt so respondent would not go into liquidation - Respondent agreed would pay applicant two $1,000 instalments and any costs associated with depositing money into applicant’s account – Authority found respondent could comply with SA agreement – Compliance ordered – Respondent to make two $1,000 payments into applicant’s account on specified dates and pay any associated transfer costs |
| Result | Compliance ordered ; No order for costs |
| Main Category | Compliance Order |
| Statutes | ERA s149 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2012_NZERA_Auckland_98.pdf [pdf 18 KB] |