| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2012] NZERA Auckland 106 |
| Determination date | 26 March 2012 |
| Member | K J Anderson |
| Representation | R Drake ; No appearance |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Traffic Management NZ Ltd v Iosefa |
| Summary | COMPLIANCE ORDER – Applicant sought compliance with settlement agreement (“SA”) – No appearance for respondent – Authority found respondent refused to engage in any way with respondent or Authority’s processes – Found respondent failed to comply with SA – Compliance ordered – PENALTY – Applicant sought penalty for respondent’s breach of SA – Found penalty appropriate given respondent’s blatant breach of SA and general filature to account for actions – $200 penalty appropriate – COSTS – Applicant sought contribution to $2,963 total costs associated with pursuing payment from respondent – Length of investigation meeting not specified – Found inappropriate to give regard to mediation costs incurred – Respondent to pay $400 contribution to applicant’s costs |
| Result | Applications granted ; Compliance ordered ; Penalty ($200)(payable to Crown) ; Costs in favour of applicant ($400) |
| Main Category | Compliance Order |
| Statutes | ERA s133;ERA s137;ERA s149;ERA s149(4);ERA s151;Employment Relations Authority Regulations 2000 r8 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2012_NZERA_Auckland_106.pdf [pdf 19 KB] |