| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2012] NZERA Christchurch 57 |
| Determination date | 03 April 2012 |
| Member | P Cheyne |
| Representation | Chan (in person) ; G McLauchlan (in person) |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Chan v G S McLauchlan & Co |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Applicant sought to reopen investigation – Applicant previously claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – No appearance for applicant at previous investigation meeting and Authority found applicant’s claim should be dismissed – Respondent opposed reopening of investigation - Applicant failed to comply with or contact Authority about Authority’s previous instructions to provide further evidence – Authority found applicant had persistently delayed and not complied with Authority instructions – Found even if applicant’s complaint valid, merits of case outweighed by applicant’s consistent delay and non-compliance – Application to reopen investigation declined |
| Result | Application dismissed ; No order for costs |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Statutes | ERA s157;ERA Second Schedule cl4 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | 2012_NZERA_Christchurch_57.pdf [pdf 15 KB] |