Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2012] NZERA Auckland 118
Determination date 10 April 2012
Member R Arthur
Representation Applicant in person ; R Warren
Location Auckland
Parties Murray v Intuto Ltd and Ors
Other Parties Warren, MacCormick
Summary JURISDICTION – Whether Authority had jurisdiction to deal with applicant’s claim - COMPLIANCE ORDER – Applicant sought compliance with parties’ settlement agreement (“SA”) – Applicant claimed had agreed to voluntary redundancy subject to first respondent (“IL”) honouring SA – Matter determined on papers – Applicant to remain employee of subsidiary of IL (“ICL”) – Respondent claimed had complied with SA and other matters not employment issues therefore Authority did not have jurisdiction to investigate matter - Applicant claimed IL failed to meet SA terms that applicant would transfer ICL shares to applicant’s family trust (“trust”), that ICL could use specified materials exclusively and trust would receive share of IL revenue – Authority found SA terms certain enough to be enforceable – Found SA terms applicant claimed had not been honoured were not owed to applicant personally – Found no evidence IL had not met SA obligations owed to applicant personally including payment of accrued leave and redundancy compensation – Found applicant bound by SA to accept payments as full and final settlement of employment-related grievances – Found applicant could not bring further claims in personal capacity before Authority – Found applicant’s redundancy not conditional on IL meeting obligations IL owed to trust and ICL – Found trust and ICL did not have employment relationship with IL therefore matter outside Authority’s jurisdiction – Application dismissed - Executive Director
Result Application dismissed ; No order for costs
Main Category Jurisdiction
Statutes ERA s114;ERA s114(4)
Number of Pages 7
PDF File Link: 2012_NZERA_Auckland_118.pdf [pdf 35 KB]