Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2012] NZERA Auckland 132
Hearing date 13 Apr 2012
Determination date 16 April 2012
Member J Crichton
Representation C Murray ; No appearance
Location Auckland
Parties Angell v Hawley & Ors
Other Parties Hair Focus, 2L Ltd
Summary JURISDICTION – Identity of employer – No appearance for respondent - Applicant offered employment by first respondent (“L”) – Applicant employed to work at premises of second respondent (“HF”) – L also owned third respondent - Authority found applicant could not have been expected to be aware employed by limited liability company - Found applicant employed by L personally - UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by L’s decision to sell HF – L accepted offered applicant employment – Applicant resigned from previous position and claimed expected would be given employment agreement on first day at HF – L told applicant day before commencement date employment no longer available as HF had been sold – Applicant claimed shocked and very distressed when told - L requested applicant attend work for one day as some clients already booked in – Applicant denied aware HF for sale when applied for position – Found L’s claim applicant aware HF would be sold fanciful – Found parties intended that applicant’s employment would be longer than one day – Found applicant unjustifiably disadvantaged by L’s actions – REMEDIES – No contributory conduct - $3,500 reimbursement of lost wages - $3,000 compensation appropriate – COSTS – Investigation meeting less than one day – L to pay applicant $1,000 contribution towards costs - Stylist
Result Applications granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($3,500) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($3,000) ; Costs in favour of applicant ($1,000) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee)
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s6
Number of Pages 7
PDF File Link: 2012_NZERA_Auckland_132.pdf [pdf 33 KB]