| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2012] NZERA Christchurch 78 |
| Determination date | 01 May 2012 |
| Member | H Doyle |
| Representation | A McInally ; R Towner |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | NZ Amalgamated Engineering, Printing & Manufacturing Union Inc v Holcim (New Zealand) Ltd |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for removal to Employment Court (“EC”) – Parties sought order for removal on grounds important question of law likely to arise and in all circumstances matter should be determined by EC – Parties claimed matter involved long serving employees’ annual leave entitlements and challenge likely – Parties claimed important question of law likely to arise whether particular evidence admissible – Authority found leave entitlements question likely to affect parties’ ongoing relationship and matter raised important question of law – Found in all circumstances EC should determine matter – Matter removed to EC |
| Result | Application granted ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Statutes | ERA s178(2)(a);ERA s178(2)(d) |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | 2012_NZERA_Christchurch_78.pdf [pdf 11 KB] |