| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2012] NZERA Christchurch 176 |
| Determination date | 21 August 2012 |
| Member | H Doyle |
| Representation | D Kilpatrick ; D Black |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | McClintock v Allied Investments Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS - Unsuccessful personal grievance and unsuccessful counterclaim - Length of investigation meeting not specified - Respondent sought $13,367 contribution towards costs - Applicant claimed respondent should incur costs involved in defending counterclaim or costs should lie where they fall - Authority found personal grievance more significant than counterclaim, though discount should be made for cost of defending counterclaim - Applicant to pay respondent $2,700 contribution towards costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of respondent ($2,700) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Cases Cited | PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] 1 ERNZ 808 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | 2012_NZERA_Christchurch_176.pdf [pdf 139 KB] |