Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2012] NZERA Auckland 313
Hearing date 22 Aug 2012
Determination date 10 September 2012
Member A Fitzgibbon
Representation M Moncur ; M Macnab
Parties Beckman v Abdul Hussein t/a Hairpro New Lynn
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Redundancy - Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by reduction in working hours and unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Applicant hospitalised and took periods of sick leave – Alleged abusive phone call - Dismissal following return from holiday - Retail assistant
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND -;UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Applicant aware of respondent’s financial difficulties and had met with respondent to discuss how savings could be made. No unjustifiable disadvantage. Respondent had genuine commercial reason to make applicant’s position redundant. Respondent did not adequately comply with statutory obligations and carry out fair process when dismissing applicant. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: No contributory conduct. $2,500 compensation appropriate.
Result Application granted; Compensation for humiliation etc ($2,500); Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s4;ERA s4(1A)(c);ERA s4(1A)(c)(i);ERA s4(1A)(c)(ii);ERA s103A;ERA s103A(3);ERA s103A(2);ERA s124
Cases Cited G N Hale & Sons Ltd v Wellington etc Caretakers etc IUOW (1990) ERNZ Sel Cas 843; [1991] 1 NZLR 151;Simpsons Farms Ltd v Aberhart [2006] ERNZ 825
Number of Pages 11
PDF File Link: 2012_NZERA_Auckland_313.pdf [pdf 300 KB]