| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2012] NZERA Christchurch 276 |
| Hearing date | 2 Nov 2012 |
| Determination date | 17 December 2012 |
| Member | M B Loftus |
| Representation | D Beck ; A Boniface |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | B v C t/a D and Anor |
| Other Parties | D Ltd |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Identity of employer - UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL Sexual Harassment – Constructive Dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by sexual harassment at workplace and unjustifiably dismissed by first respondent – Inappropriate touching – Swearing about co-workers |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND –;PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Authority ordered non-publication of parties’ identities. Applicant employed by second respondent;UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: On balance of probabilities alleged harassment did not occur. No unjustified disadvantage. No constructive dismissal |
| Result | Applications dismissed; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Personal Grievance |
| Cases Cited | Z v A [1993] 2 ERNZ 469 |
| Number of Pages | 6 |
| PDF File Link: | 2012_NZERA_Christchurch_276.pdf [pdf 157 KB] |