Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No [2013] NZERA Christchurch 20
Hearing date 11 Dec 2012
Determination date 25 January 2013
Member M B Loftus
Representation A Marsh ; C O'Brien (in person)
Location Wanaka
Parties Fisher v O'Brien
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Dismissal - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Respondent claimed parties had casual employment relationship and applicant engaged on 'as and when required' basis – Applicant took on regular cleaning duties for respondent – Respondent claimed applicant swore in presence of children and drove vehicle too fast - Respondent claimed disharmony between children and applicant – Child minder
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND -;UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Cleaning duties introduced element of regularly scheduled work meaning ongoing employment relationship between parties. Respondent failed to put issues to applicant or allow applicant to explain or consider explanation. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: No contributory conduct. Respondent to pay applicant $1,779 reimbursement of lost wages. $4,000 compensation appropriate.
Result Applicant granted; Reimbursement of lost wages ($1,779); Compensation for humiliation etc ($4,000); Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A;ERA s103A(3)(b);ERA s103A(3)(c);ERA s103A(3)(d);ERA s124;ERA s128(2)
Cases Cited Barnes (formerly Kissell) v Whangarei Returned Services Assoc (Inc) [1007] ERNZ 626;Jinkinson v Oceana Gold (NZ) Ltd [2009] ERNZ 225
Number of Pages 7
PDF File Link: 2013_NZERA_Christchurch_20.pdf [pdf 160 KB]