| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2013] NZERA Christchurch 22 |
| Determination date | 30 January 2013 |
| Member | H Doyle |
| Representation | K Coulston ; A Smalley |
| Parties | Mokomoko and Anor v La Famia Foundation NZ and Anor |
| Other Parties | Harpur ; La Famia Number 2 Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS - Successful personal grievance claims and partially successful counterclaims - Three days investigation meeting – Applicants sought $12,000 contribution towards costs – Authority found fairest approach to make no change to daily tariff for success or otherwise of counterclaims – Respondents to pay applicants $9,333 contribution towards costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of applicants ($9,333.33); Disbursements in favour of applicants ($204)(hearing fees) ($71.56)(filing fee) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Cases Cited | Glen v Wilfred Investments Ltd [2013] NZERA Christchurch 23;Mokomoko and Anor v La Famia Foundation NZ and Anor [2012] NZERA Christchurch 278;PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2013_NZERA_Christchurch_22.pdf [pdf 146 KB] |