Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No [2013] NZERA Christchurch 24
Hearing date 4 Dec 2012
Determination date 04 February 2013
Member M B Loftus
Representation J Smith ; P Brown
Location Christchurch
Parties Cracroft-Wilson v Mount Hutt Station Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Serious Misconduct - Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by respondents disciplinary process and respondents breach of good faith. Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed - Whether death of stock could be attributed to applicant - Farm - COUNTERCLAIM - RECOVERY OF MONIES - Respondent sought recovery of monies for loss suffered - Assistant manager
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND -;UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Unacceptable for respondent to assume applicant knowledgeable on stock disease. Poor performance not serious misconduct. Respondent failed to follow fair process. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: No contributory conduct. Respondent to pay applicant $7,307 reimbursement of lost wages. $5000 compensation appropriate.;COUNTERCLAIM - RECOVERY OF MONIES: Applicant's failure to apply skills never obtained not enough to support respondents claim. No recovery of monies.
Result Application granted (unjustified disadvantage-unjustified dismissal); Reimbursement of lost wages ($7,307.69); Compensation for humiliation etc ($5,000); Application dismissed (counterclaim-recovery of monies); Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A - ERA s124 - ERA s128(2)
Number of Pages 10
PDF File Link: 2013_NZERA_Christchurch_24.pdf [pdf 179 KB]