Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2013] NZERA Auckland 74
Hearing date 31 Aug 2012
Determination date 04 March 2013
Member K J Anderson
Representation A Singh ; S McKenna
Location Hamilton
Parties Griffiths v A1 Bobcats & Concrete Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Abandonment – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent - Decision on use of concrete accelerant - Text messages exchanged between parties with alleged abusive language from respondent – Partner’s pregnancy related issues kept applicant from work - Respondent’s offer of reinstatement rejected by applicant - Concrete Labourer
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Applicant indicated available for work and did not abandon employment. Both parties failed to be responsive and communicative. Applicant dismissed. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: 50 per cent contributory conduct. Respondent to pay applicant reimbursement of lost wages (quantum to be determined).
Result Application granted; Contributory conduct (50%); Reimbursement of lost wages (quantum to be determined); Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s4;ERA s4(1A);ERA s103A;ERA s124;ERA s128(2)
Cases Cited Allen v Transpacific Industries Group Ltd (t/a “Medismart Ltd”) [2009] 6 NZELR 530;E N Ramsbottom Ltd v Chambers [2000] 2 ERNZ 97;Pitolua v Auckland City Council Municipal Abattoir and Auckland & Tomoana Freezing Works etc IUOW [1992] 1 ERNZ 693; [1992] 1 NZLR 6
Number of Pages 10
PDF File Link: 2013_NZERA_Auckland_74.pdf [pdf 237 KB]