Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2013] NZERA Auckland 87
Hearing date 23 Nov 2012
Determination date 15 March 2013
Member T G Tetitaha
Representation S Mitchell ; T P Cleary
Location Whangarei
Parties Hita v Silver Fern Farms Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious Misconduct - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent - Applicant swore at supervisor and allegedly failed to follow instruction - Applicant threw meat product near another worker - Allegation speed of production chain too high - Existing warning for tapping knife - Obscene note - Allegation applicant seriously disruptive to plant operations – Boner
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Applicant disrespectful with bad language and attitude but not abusive in circumstances of case. Applicant did not fail to follow instruction. Respondent did not sufficiently investigate allegations prior to dismissal. Respondent did not raise concerns with applicant or give applicant opportunity to respond. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: 50 per cent contributory conduct. Reinstatement not practicable and reasonable. Respondent to pay applicant $6,000 reimbursement of lost wages. $3,000 compensation appropriate. Interest payable.
Result Application granted; Contributory conduct (50%); Reimbursement of lost wages ($6,000.75); Compensation for humiliation etc ($3,000); Interest (5%); Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A(2);ERA s103A(3);ERA s103A(3)(a);ERA s103A(3)(b);ERA s103A(3)(c);ERA s103A(3)(d);ERA s103A(4);ERA s103A(5);ERA s124;ERA s125(2);ERA s128(2);ERA Second Schedule cl11
Cases Cited Angus v Ports of Auckland Ltd (2011) 9 NZELC 94,015;Clarke v Norske Skog Tasman Ltd [2003] 2 ERNZ 213;Davies v Cityline (NZ) Ltd t/a Stagecoach Auckland unreported, L Robinson, 17 Oct 2006, AA 321/06;Lewis v Howick College Board of Trustees (2010) 7 NZELR 539;Morgan v Cotterill Security Fencing and Gates Ltd unreported, R A Monaghan, 2 Sep 2008, AA 316/08;New Zealand Institute of Fashion Technology v Aitken [2004] 2 ERNZ 340;STAMS v Denhards Bakeries Co (No 2) [1991] 3 ERNZ 941
Number of Pages 13
PDF File Link: 2013_NZERA_Auckland_87.pdf [pdf 335 KB]