| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2013] NZERA Auckland 90 |
| Determination date | 19 March 2013 |
| Member | P R Stapp |
| Representation | E Mander (in person) ; P McBride |
| Parties | Mander v IHC New Zealand Ltd |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Application to re-open investigation - Applicant unsuccessful in previous authority determination - Applicant claimed Authority biased, made omissions and incorrectly gave weight to various matters - Applicant claimed legal test not properly applied and fresh evidence available to support applicant's case |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND -;PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: No injustice if case not re-opened. Applicant not happy with outcome not reason to re-open. Challenge to Employment Court available to applicant. Application dismissed. |
| Result | Application dismissed; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Statutes | ERA s114 |
| Cases Cited | Advkit Para Legal Services Ltd v Weston [2011] NZEmpC 117;Reid v New Zealand Fire Service Commission (No 2) [1998] 3 ERNZ 1237;Ports of Auckland v New Zealand Waterfront Workers Union [1995] 2 ERNZ 85 |
| Number of Pages | 6 |
| PDF File Link: | 2013_NZERA_Auckland_90.pdf [pdf 158 KB] |