| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 311/02 |
| Hearing date | 2 Oct 2002 |
| Determination date | 18 October 2002 |
| Member | Y S Oldfield |
| Representation | N Haidas (In person), No appearance, K Haidas (In person), SN Begum (In person) ; No appearance |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Haidas & Ors v Kang |
| Other Parties | Yang, Haidas, Begum |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Second applicant unable to attend investigation meeting at short notice - Inappropriate to deprive applicant of opportunity to be heard - Matter to be heard at later date - Supplementary statement to be filed - ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY - Respondent opened business for one week - No employment agreements - No wage and time records - Applicants instrumental in establishing business - Arrears claims made out - Applicants entitled to holiday pay - PENALTY - Financial difficulties considered - Inappropriate to impose further sanctions |
| Result | Application granted ; Orders accordingly ; Arrears of wages and holiday pay ($826)(NH) ; ($1,060)(KH) ; ($1,128.90)(SNB) ; Costs in favour of applicants ($70)(Filing fee) |
| Statutes | ERA s130;ERA s132 |
| Number of Pages | 5 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |