| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2013] NZERA Auckland 217 |
| Determination date | 29 May 2013 |
| Member | A Fitzgibbon |
| Representation | H White ; A Russell |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Amalgamated Workers' Union of New Zealand Inc v Counties Manukau District Health Board |
| Summary | COSTS - Dispute answered in favour of respondent - One day investigation meeting - Respondent sought $5,250 contribution towards costs - Authority found submissions in writing following investigation meeting did not impact costs and notional daily tariff without adjustment appropriate - Applicant to pay respondent $3,500 contribution towards costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of respondent ($3,500) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA;ERA Second Schedule cl15 |
| Cases Cited | Amalgamated Workers' Union of New Zealand Inc v Counties Manukau District Health Board [2013] NZERA Auckland 177;Carter Holt Harvey Ltd v Eastern Bays Independent Industrial Workers Union [2011] NZEmpC 13;Fifita (aka Bloomfield) v Dunedin Casinos Ltd [2012] NZERA Christchurch 219;PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2013_NZERA_Auckland_217.pdf [pdf 221 KB] |