Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2013] NZERA Auckland 226
Hearing date 22 May 2013
Determination date 05 June 2013
Member A Dumbleton
Representation T Stevens, R Cahn ; P Wicks
Parties Nova Energy Ltd v Mitchell and Ors
Other Parties National Energy Ltd, A Mitchell
Summary PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Respondents sought variation of consent orders restricting access to applicant’s briefs of evidence – First respondent’s employment with applicant ended – First respondent removed confidential and commercially sensitive information – Consent orders made restricting access to confidential information given as evidence – Passages in two briefs of evidence redacted – Respondents permitted to view two briefs of evidence at counsel’s chambers – Respondents sought direction regarding unsupervised and unrestricted access to briefs of evidence – Respondents challenged validity of certain redactions – Whether challenged redactions sensitive or highly confidential information – Senior manager
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Substantive allegations admitted by respondents. Strong grounds for applicant to believe respondents would misuse confidential information. Remedies sought substantial. Insufficient detail to indicate redactions highly confidential and commercially sensitive. Confidential information learned by first respondent likely to remain in memory. Threshold for preventing party from knowing all evidence not reached. Respondents entitled to see strength of information relied upon by applicant. Consent orders in relation to redacted evidence varied. Application for direction regarding unsupervised and unrestricted access to briefs of evidence adjourned.
Result Application partially granted ; Orders made ; Costs reserved
Main Category Practice & Procedure
Cases Cited Nova Energy Ltd v Mitchell [2013] NZERA Auckland 180
Number of Pages 7
PDF File Link: 2013_NZERA_Auckland_226.pdf [pdf 156 KB]