Restrictions Includes non-publication order
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No [2013] NZERA Christchurch 110
Hearing date 26 Feb 2013
Determination date 14 June 2013
Member C Hickey
Representation J Wilson ; K Campbell
Location Oamaru
Parties Molloy v The RJ & DE Smaill Partnership t/a Ladybird Hill
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Redundancy – Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by respondent’s failure to provide employment agreement and unilateral changes to terms and conditions of employment – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – No employment agreement – Respondent understaffed – Long hours – Emotional outburst – Whether applicant demoted – Whether intention to reopen restaurant – Applicant legally aided – Restaurant manager
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;UNJUSTISFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Authority ordered non-publication of respondent’s financial accounts. Applicant unjustifiably disadvantaged by reduction in managerial status. Engagement of second chef over holiday period not agreed term or condition of applicant’s employment. Applicant unjustifiably disadvantaged by respondent’s failure to provide employment agreement. Decision to close business fair and reasonable and genuine business decision. Respondent failed to consult applicant. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: No contributory conduct. $4,500 compensation appropriate.
Result Applications granted ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($4,500) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s4(1A);ERA s4(1A)(b);ERA s4(1A)(c);ERA s63A;ERA s65;ERA s103A;ERA s103A(3);ERA s124;ERA Second Schedule cl10(1)
Cases Cited Rittson-Thomas (t/as Totara Hills Farms) v Davidson (2013) 10 NZELR 391
Number of Pages 15
PDF File Link: 2013_NZERA_Christchurch_110.pdf [pdf 212 KB]