| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2013] NZERA Auckland 264 |
| Determination date | 21 June 2013 |
| Member | E Robinson |
| Representation | E Hartdegen ; C Eggleston |
| Parties | Hull v Edginton Resources Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS - Partially successful claims - Two days investigation meeting - Respondent sought $7,000 contribution towards costs - Authority found respondent entitled to some costs in respect of applicant's unsuccessful further claims but not appropriate for Authority to impose hardship on applicant and lowering of daily tariff warranted - Applicant to pay respondent $2,500 contribution towards costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of respondent ($2,500) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA Second Schedule cl15 |
| Cases Cited | Hull v Edginton Resources Ltd [2013] NZERA Auckland 190;New Zealand Automobile Assoc Inc v McKay [1996] 2 ERNZ 622;PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808;Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee [2001] ERNZ 305 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | 2013_NZERA_Auckland_264.pdf [pdf 146 KB] |