Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No [2013] NZERA Wellington 116
Hearing date 16 Jul 2013
Determination date 26 September 2013
Member P R Stapp
Representation N Bridgeman (in person) ; J D Turner
Location New Plymouth
Parties Bridgeman v Programmed Maintenance Services (NZ) Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Redundancy - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Respondent did not conduct performance review for applicant - No work no pay provision in employment agreement - Following falling off of work respondent used matrix to score employees for redundancy selection - Applicant claimed manager did not have sufficient knowledge of applicant to make meaningful evaluation - Painter
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND -;UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Respondent did not adequately consult regarding process or plan timetable for restructuring. Respondent did not adequately deal with applicant’s complaint regarding manager engaged in evaluation. Respondent gave applicant no notice of existence of scoring matrix prior to meeting. Discussion on alternatives to reducing positions held but no agreement reached. Respondent’s reduction in numbers due to unavailability of work and performance of affected employees rather than full costs analysis to make savings as number of positions affected to be made redundant not explained. Applicant dismissed. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: No contributory conduct. $5,000 compensation appropriate.
Result Application granted ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($5,000) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee) ; No order for costs
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA;ERA s103A;ERA s103A(2);ERA s103A(3)(a);Holidays Act 2003
Cases Cited Angus v Ports of Auckland Ltd (No 2) [2011] ERNZ 466;Gilbert v Transfield Services (New Zealand) Ltd (2013) 10 NZELC 79,023;GN Hale & Sons Ltd v Wellington Caretakers IUOW (1990) ERNZ Sel Cas 843; [1991] 1 NZLR 151;Rittson-Thomas (t/as Totara Hills Farms) v Davidson (2013) 10 NZELR 391;Tan v Morningstar Institute of Education t/a Morningstar Preschool [2013] NZEmpC 82
Number of Pages 16
PDF File Link: 2013_NZERA_Wellington_116.pdf [pdf 267 KB]