Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2013] NZERA Auckland 490
Hearing date 24 Oct 2013
Determination date 24 October 2013
Member R Arthur
Representation J Ingham (in person) ; no appearance
Parties Ingham (Labour Inspector) v Kingston and Latras Autos Ltd
Summary COMPLIANCE ORDER - PENALTY: Applicant sought compliance with improvement notice - Applicant sought penalty for respondent's failure to comply with improvement notice - No appearance for respondent
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND -;COMPLIANCE ORDER - PENALTY: Compliance ordered. $1,500 penalty appropriate.
Result Application granted; Compliance ordered; Penalty ($1,500)(payable to Crown); No order for costs; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee)
Main Category Compliance Order
Statutes ERA s135 - ERA s135(2) - ERA s136 - ERA s137 - ERA s223D - ERA s223F - ERA Second Schedule cl 11 - Holidays Act 2003
Cases Cited Spence (Labour Inspector) v Oakridge Masonry Ltd [2012] NZERA Auckland 414;Xu v McIntosh [2004] 2 ERNZ 448
Number of Pages 5
PDF File Link: 2013_NZERA_Auckland_490.pdf [pdf 160 KB]