Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2013] NZERA Auckland 513
Hearing date 18 Jun 2013
Determination date 13 November 2013
Member K J Anderson
Representation S Barter ; B Edwards
Location Auckland
Parties Tristcott v Callplus Services ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Abandonment - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent - Respondent concerned with applicant's performance - Failure to meet targets - Applicant asked by respondent to consider alternative role - Applicant off work due to applicant's partner in hospital - Applicant informed respondent that applicant would not return to work - Applicant later clarified applicant meant would not return to work for rest of week - Limited correspondence from applicant - Further absence - Respondent unable to contact applicant - Illegible medical certificate - Whether applicant absent without notification - Channel manager
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND -;UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Applicant failed to return to work when expected but no three consecutive days without notice. Termination in breach of employment agreement. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: 100 per cent contributory conduct.
Result Application granted; Contributory conduct (100%); Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s4 - ERA s4(1A)(b) - ERA s103A(2) - ERA s124 - ERA s128 - ERA s128(3)
Number of Pages 20
PDF File Link: 2013_NZERA_Auckland_513.pdf [pdf 285 KB]