| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2014] NZERA Auckland 52 |
| Hearing date | 13 Feb 2014 |
| Determination date | 14 February 2014 |
| Member | T G Tetitaha |
| Representation | R Voss (in person) ; E G McWatt |
| Parties | Voss v Regent International Education Group Ltd |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Admissibility of evidence - Respondent sought late admission of evidence - Subsequently discovered misconduct by applicant |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND -;PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Timetable to file evidence extended at respondent's request. No explanation for why information not discovered earlier. Evidence reasonably available for earlier production. Evidence inconclusive and disputed. Evidence did not greatly assist Authority in reaching conclusion about subsequently discovered misconduct. Evidence inadmissible. |
| Result | Application dismissed; No order for costs |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | 2014_NZERA_Auckland_52.pdf [pdf 83 KB] |