Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2014] NZERA Auckland 72
Hearing date 25 Feb 2014
Determination date 03 March 2014
Member T G Tetitaha
Representation M Whitehead ; S Grice
Location Tauranga
Parties Kiwa and Ors v Phil's Place Ltd
Summary COUNTERCLAIM - BREACH OF CONTRACT - Respondent sought damages for applicants' breach of confidentiality clause in parties' employment agreement (EA") - Whether applicants instructed advocate to make comments about respondent to media - COUNTERCLAIM - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Respondent sought order preventing advocate from acting for applicants given advocate's involvement in counterclaim"
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND -;COUNTERCLAIM - BREACH OF CONTRACT: Dispute between parties publicly known prior to advocate commented to media. Comments did not contain specific details prohibited by EA. Advocate only acknowledged fact of dispute and facts not confidential when publicly known. Applicants did not instruct advocate to make comments. Applicant very aware of prohibition. No breach of contract.;COUNTERCLAIM - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Not appropriate for same person to appear as advocate and witness. Advocate ordered to no longer continue acting for applicants.
Result Application dismissed (counterclaim - breach of contract); Application granted (counterclaim - practice and procedure); Orders made; No order for costs
Main Category Breach of Contract
Statutes ERA s134(1) ERA s134(2) - ERA s157(1)(a) - ERA s160(1)(f) - Lawyers and Conveyances Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care Rules 2008) r13.5.3
Cases Cited James & Co Ltd v Hughes [1995] 2 ERNZ 432;McDonald v Mason Services Ltd [1998] 2 ERNZ 346;Reid v New Zealand Fire Service Commission [1998] 3 ERNZ 745
Number of Pages 6
PDF File Link: 2014_NZERA_Auckland_72.pdf [pdf 231 KB]