Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 59/01
Determination date 28 May 2001
Member WRC Gardiner
Representation A Henrda ; JP Corbett
Location Auckland
Parties Ashworth v Tokoroa Club Inc
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Redundancy - Applicant's position and another identical position restructured into one new position - Dismissed and given option to apply along with outside applicants for new position - No prior warning or consultation - Unsuccessfully applied for new position - Given payment in lieu of notice - Redundancy provision in contract did not allow notice to be substituted with a payment in lieu - Respondent did not act in bad faith nor did it act in good faith - Dismissal procedurally unfair - No difference between job descriptions of new position and old positions - In reality one of the old positions became redundant - Erroneous to view situation as a restructuring and to advertise a new" position - Applicant's dismissal should have been considered using selection for redundancy criteria - Dismissal substantively unjustified - Reinstatement not impracticable despite staff surpluses - Remedy for reimbursement reduced for mitigation - Bar manager"
Result Application granted ; Reinstatement ordered ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($3,895.65) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($4,000) ; Costs reserved
Statutes ERA s4;ERA s125;ERA s126
Cases Cited Aoraki Corporation Ltd v McGavin [1998] 1 ERNZ 601;Atwill v Tanners Timber World Ltd [1994] 1 ERNZ 321;Baguley v Coutts Cars Ltd [2000] 2 ERNZ 409;Carter Holt Harvey Ltd v Wallis [1998] 3 ERNZ 984;Commerer v Red Eagle Corporation Ltd unreported, Goddard CJ, 27 June 2000, WC 29A/00;Northern Clerical Union v Beachlands Engineering Ltd [1991] 3 ERNZ 1023;NZ Public Service Association Inc v Land Corporation Ltd [1991] 1 ERNZ 747;Wilkinson v Wairarapa Crown Health Enterprise Ltd [1999] 2 ERNZ 133
Number of Pages 15
PDF File Link: aa 59_01.pdf [pdf 61 KB]