| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2014] NZERA Auckland 222 |
| Determination date | 09 June 2014 |
| Member | A Fitzgibbon |
| Representation | H Fulton ; D Dickinson |
| Parties | Tozer v Franix Construction Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS - Successful jurisdiction claim - One day investigation meeting - Applicant sought $3,581 contribution towards costs - Authority found appropriate to award costs based on notional daily tariff - Respondent to pay applicant $3,500 contribution towards costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of applicant ($3,500) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA Second Schedule cl15 |
| Cases Cited | Carter Holt Harvey Ltd v Eastern Bays Independent Industrial Workers Union [2011] NZEmpC 13;Fifita (aka Bloomfield) v Dunedin Casinos Ltd [2012] NZERA Christchurch 219;PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808;Tozer v Franix Construction Ltd [2014] NZERA Auckland 170 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | 2014_NZERA_Auckland_222.pdf [pdf 150 KB] |