| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2014] NZERA Auckland 277 |
| Determination date | 01 July 2014 |
| Member | J Crichton |
| Representation | F Wood ; R Harrison ; M Armstrong |
| Parties | Phibbs and Anor v Poutiri Community Practices Ltd and Ors |
| Other Parties | Wilson ; Poutiri Trust, Ringakaha Prime Care Ltd, Armstrong |
| Summary | COSTS - Unsuccessful jurisdiction claim against third and fourth respondents (respondents") - No investigation meeting - Respondents sought indemnity costs - No prospect of successful outcome - No employment relationship between parties - Indemnity costs appropriate - Applicants to pay third respondent $987 indemnity costs and fourth respondent $5,937 indemnity costs" |
| Result | Costs in favour of third and fourth defendants ($987.50)(third respondent) ($5,937.50)(fourth respondent) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Cases Cited | Phibbs and Anor v Poutiri Community Practices Ltd and Ors [2014] NZERA Auckland 28;PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] 1 ERNZ 808;aa39/04 |
| Number of Pages | 7 |
| PDF File Link: | 2014_NZERA_Auckland_277.pdf [pdf 105 KB] |