| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2014] NZERA Christchurch 122 |
| Determination date | 12 August 2014 |
| Member | H Doyle |
| Representation | M Henderson, G Biggs ; E Butcher |
| Parties | White v Telecom New Zealand Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS - Partially successful claims - Two day investigation meeting - Applicant sought $12,000 contribution towards costs - Matter heard at same time as another applicant - Applicant made $34,000 calderbank offer - Starting point one day investigation - Part of the claim had degree of factual complexity, increase appropriate - Document omitted by mistake resulted in additional expense and warranted upward increase to daily tariff - Decrease appropriate as applicant unsuccessful in respect of personal grievance - Respondent to pay applicant $3,900 contribution towards costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of applicant ($3,900); Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee) ($17.25)(courier) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Cases Cited | PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] 1 ERNZ 808 |
| Number of Pages | 8 |
| PDF File Link: | 2014_NZERA_Christchurch_122.pdf [pdf 166 KB] |