| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2014] NZERA Christchurch 140 |
| Hearing date | 5 Sep 2014 |
| Determination date | 09 September 2014 |
| Member | M B Loftus |
| Representation | D Tomlin (in person) ; No appearance |
| Location | Dunedin |
| Parties | Tomlin v Tasker |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Identity of employer - Whether applicant employed by respondent, respondent's deceased father (T") or T's company - No appearance for respondent" |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND -;PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Applicant employed by T's company and respondent did not assume responsibility for employment relationship. Applicant not employed by respondent. Authority noted applicant's arrears of holiday pay claim would have failed as claim inflated and T's company had no money. Authority noted laptop sought by applicant property of T's company. |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs to lie where they fall |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Number of Pages | 5 |
| PDF File Link: | 2014_NZERA_Christchurch_140.pdf [pdf 112 KB] |