Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2014] NZERA Auckland 419
Hearing date 2 Sep 2014
Determination date 10 October 2014
Member R Arthur
Representation S Leftley ; P Swarbrick
Location Whangarei
Parties Phillips v Juken New Zealand Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Redundancy - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent - Restructure - Warehouse manager
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND -;UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Applicant too stunned at news to comment at time. Applicant not given information in form he could take away and consider. Options for continued employment narrowed. Respondent field to explore options for potential redeployment as alternative to dismissal. Respondent failed to offer job search assistance, counseling or EAP and confirmed respondent's general lack of sensitivity in carrying out dismissal. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: $8,000 compensation appropriate.
Result Application granted; Costs reserved
Statutes ERA s4;ERA s174
Cases Cited Angus v Ports of Auckland Ltd (No 2) [2011] ERNZ 466;na Nagara v McGrath, Chief Executive of the Auckland College of Education unreported, Travis J 13 Sept 1996, AEC56/96;New Zealand Fasteners Stainless Ltd v Thwaites [2000] 1 ERNZ 739;PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808;Rittson-Thomas (t/as Totara Hills Farm) v Davidson (2013) 10 NZELR 391;Rolls v Wellington Gas Co Ltd [1998] 3 ERNZ 116;Savage v Unlimited Architecture Ltd [1999] 2 ERNZ 40;Simpson Farms Ltd v Aberhart [2006] ERNZ 825;Tan v Morningstar Institute of Education Ltd t/a Morningstar Preschool [2013] NZEmpC 82;Telecom New Zealand Ltd v Nutter [2004] 1 ERNZ 315;Trotter v Telecom Corp of New Zealand Ltd [1993] 2 ERNZ 659
Number of Pages 10
PDF File Link: 2014_NZERA_Auckland_419.pdf [pdf 267 KB]