Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2014] NZERA Auckland 432
Determination date 21 October 2014
Member E Robinson
Representation X (in person) ; B Edwards
Parties X v Y
Summary COUNTERCLAIM – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Respondent sought permanent non-publication order in respect of identities of parties and respondent’s chief executive (“CEO”), and claims made by applicant about behaviour of CEO and other employees of respondent – Interim non-publication order granted by Authority previously
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;COUNTERCLAIM – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Unsubstantiated claims against CEO would affect respondent negatively and would have adverse effect on very vulnerable members of society respondent existed to benefit. Respondent particularly vulnerable as charity. Authority ordered permanent non-publication of identities of parties and CEO, and applicant’s claims of allegedly inappropriate behaviour by CEO and other employees of respondent.
Result Application granted ; No order for costs
Main Category Practice & Procedure
Statutes ERA Second Schedule cl10;ERA Second Schedule cl10(1);New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990;New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 s14
Cases Cited Anderson v The Employment Tribunal [1992] 1 ERNZ 500;Clark v Attorney-General (No 1) [2005] NZAR 481;Davis v Bank of New Zealand [2004] 2 ERNZ 511;H v A Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 92;Lewis v Wilson & Horton Ltd [2000] 3 NZLR 546;The King v Sussex Justices, Ex parte McCarthy [1924] 1 KB 256
Number of Pages 5
PDF File Link: 2014_NZERA_Auckland_432.pdf [pdf 1 MB]