Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No [2014] NZERA Christchurch 172
Hearing date 3 Sep 2014
Determination date 04 November 2014
Member C Hickey
Representation J Goldstein ; A Riches
Parties May v Geotech Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Redundancy – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Whether applicant resigned after being told of redundancy – General manager
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Applicant dismissed at management meeting and did not resign subsequently. Genuine financial reasons for redundancies at respondent. Projects applicant involved in legitimate areas for respondent to decide no longer needed manager at applicant’s level based in applicant’s region. Respondent did not propose to undertake fair consultation process. Applicant may have known respondent in difficulty but not told in clearest terms that own position at risk and given opportunity to offer alternatives to save position. Possibility of applicant being employed in two other available roles not explored by respondent. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: No contributory conduct. Respondent to pay applicant reimbursement of lost wages, quantum to be determined. Leave reserved for applicant to return to Authority if parties unable to agree quantum. $7,000 compensation appropriate.
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages (quantum to be determined) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($7,000) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s4;ERA s4(1A)(c);ERA s103A;ERA s124;ERA s128(2);ERA s128(3);ERA s174
Cases Cited G N Hale & Sons Ltd v Wellington etc Caretakers etc IUOW (1990) ERNZ Sel Cas 843 ; [1991] 1 NZLR 151;New Zealand Fasteners Stainless Ltd v Thwaites [2000] 1 ERNZ 739 ; [2000] 2 NZLR 565;Rittson-Thomas, (T/A Totara Hills Farm) v Davidson [2013] ERNZ 55
Number of Pages 15
PDF File Link: 2014_NZERA_Christchurch_172.pdf [pdf 271 KB]