Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2014] NZERA Auckland 454
Determination date 06 November 2014
Member D Appleton
Representation S Hornsby-Geluk ; R Upton
Parties Burke v Employers & Manufacturers Assoc (Northern) Inc
Summary COSTS – Partially successful claims – Three days investigation meeting – Respondent sought $40,000 contribution towards costs – Respondent made $20,000 Calderbank offer – Authority found respondent’s conduct not such as to warrant reversing principle that costs follow event – Found not appropriate to increase notional daily tariff due to applicant’s conduct – Found applicant’s desire to show that treated unfairly by respondent not sufficient to set aside Calderbank offer – Found appropriate to increase notional daily tariff due to applicant’s unreasonable rejection of Calderbank offer – Found applicant’s financial circumstances did not warrant reduction in notional daily tariff – Applicant to pay respondent $20,000 contribution towards costs - Authority ordered payment by instalments
Result Costs in favour of respondent ($20,000) ; Disbursements in favour of respondent ($554.40)(travel costs)($428)(accommodation costs)
Main Category Costs
Statutes ERA Second Schedule cl15;Minimum Wage Act 1983
Cases Cited Bluestar Print Group (NZ) Ltd v Mitchell [2010] ERNZ 446;Booth v Big Kahuna Holdings Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 43;Burke v Employers and Manufacturers Assoc (Northern) Inc [2014] NZERA Auckland 218;Burke v Employers & Manufacturers Assoc (Northern) Inc [2014] NZERA Auckland 405;Gates v Air New Zealand Ltd [2010] NZEmpC 26;George v Auckland Council [2014] NZEmpC 100;Harvey Norman Stores (NZ) Pty Ltd v Boult [2014] NZEmpC 28;Health Waikato Ltd v Elmsly [2004] 1 ERNZ 172;Mattingly v Strata Title Management Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 15;Ogilvy & Mather (NZ) Ltd v Darroch [1993] 2 ERNZ 943;PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808
Number of Pages 13
PDF File Link: 2014_NZERA_Auckland_454.pdf [pdf 300 KB]