Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2014] NZERA Auckland 455
Determination date 07 November 2014
Member R Larmer
Representation P Muir ; P Cranney
Parties Vice-Chancellor, University of Auckland v Tertiary Education Union
Summary DISPUTE – Parties disputed whether applicant able to amend certain policy without respondent’s agreement – Whether applicant able to amend certain policy after participatory review process established by collective employment agreement (“CEA”) ended without agreement
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;DISPUTE: Plain wording of relevant clauses in CEA indicated that respondent’s agreement not required before amendments could be made to certain policy. Clauses in CEA established mechanism by which employees could participate in academic governance of University by engaging in participatory process if applicant decided to review certain policies. Requirement in previous CEA for respondent to agree to changes to certain policy not contained in current CEA. Applicant entitled to amend certain policy provided participatory process complied with. Applicant’s ability to amend policies included deleting, replacing or amalgamating policies. Question answered in favour of applicant.
Result Question answered in favour of applicant ; Costs to lie where they fall
Main Category Dispute
Cases Cited New Zealand Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd [2011] NZEmpC 144;NZ Amalgamated Engineering Printing & Manufacturing Union Inc v Amcor Packaging (New Zealand) Ltd [2011] ERNZ 409;Pyne Gould Guinness Ltd v Montgomery Watson (NZ) Ltd [2001] NZAR 789;Silver Fern Farms Ltd v New Zealand Meat Workers and Related Trade Unions Inc [2010] ERNZ 317;Van Brandenburg v Queenstown Lakes District Council unreported, Judge Jackson, Commissioners Manning and Sutherland, 28 June 2007, C85/07;Vector Gas Ltd v Bay of Plenty Energy Ltd [2010] 2 NZLR 444
Number of Pages 11
PDF File Link: 2014_NZERA_Auckland_455.pdf [pdf 259 KB]