Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2014] NZERA Auckland 470
Hearing date 14 Nov 2014
Determination date 17 November 2014
Member TG Tetitaha
Representation S E Greening ; H Patel
Location Auckland
Parties Knight v Printek Supplies Ltd t/a Datatek Pacific
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Serious Misconduct - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent - Excessive internet usage - Whether applicant entitled to compensation for loss of benefit of paid parental leave - Account manager
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND -UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: No policy about internet use. Applicant's job involved heavy internet use. Evidence about Facebook usage inconclusive. Conduct not misconduct for which dismissal appropriate. Dismissal immediate and abrupt. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: No contributory conduct. No reimbursement of lost wages as applicant failed to mitigate loss. $5,000 compensation appropriate. No compensation for loss of benefit as applicant did not meet criteria for paid parental leave.
Result Application granted; Compensation for humiliation etc ($5,000); Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A(2);ERA s103A(3);ERA s103A(5);ERA s124;ERA s128;ERA s128(1);Parental Leave and Employment Protection Act 1987;Parental Leave and Employment Protection Act 1987 s7;Parental Leave and Employment Protection Act 1987 s31;Parental Leave and Employment Protection Act 1987 s31(1);Parental Leave and Employment Protection Act 1987 s35;Parental Leave and Employment Protection Act 1987 s35(1)(a);Parental Leave and Employment Protection Act 1987 s35(1)(b)
Cases Cited Allen v Transpacific Industries Group Ltd (t/as Medismart Ltd) (2009) 6 NZELR 530;Angus v Ports of Auckland Ltd (No 2) [2011] ERNZ 466;Finau v Carter Holt Building Supplies [1993] 2 ERNZ 971;New Zealand Institute of Fashion Technology v Aitken [2004] 2 ERNZ 340
Number of Pages 9
PDF File Link: 2014_NZERA_Auckland_470.pdf [pdf 175 KB]