Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No [2014] NZERA Wellington 126
Hearing date 10 Sep 2014
Determination date 15 December 2014
Member M Ryan
Representation K O'Sullivan ; G Service
Location Wellington
Parties Callard v Wellington City Transport Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Serious misconduct - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent - Poor attendance record - Continued absences without prior notification - Non-negative alcohol test - Final written warning - Ongoing employment dependent on completion of alcohol counselling course - Failure to attend and complete alcohol counselling course - Whether failure to attend due to roster changes - Bus operator
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND -UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Respondent complied with minimum standards of procedural fairness. Applicant's conduct must be considered alongside circumstances relevant to parties. Respondent bus company with obligation to ensure safety. Applicant aware of required attendance at alcohol counselling. Respondent did not accept failure to attend due to roster changes. Loss of trust and confidence. Dismissal justified.
Result Application dismissed; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A(2);ERA s103A(3)
Cases Cited Angus v Ports of Auckland Ltd (No 2) [2011] ERNZ 466;Northern Distribution Union v BP Oil New Zealand Ltd [1992] 3 ERNZ 483;W & H Newspapers Ltd v Oram [2000] 2 ERNZ 448 ; [2001] 3 NZLR 29
Number of Pages 9
PDF File Link: 2014_NZERA_Wellington_126.pdf [pdf 283 KB]